The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled Friday that many of President Donald Trump’s tariffs, imposed under emergency powers, were illegal. The 7-4 decision by an 11-judge panel found that Trump overstepped his authority by relying on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to declare a national emergency and levy broad import taxes without sufficient justification or congressional approval.
However, the court stayed its ruling until October 14, allowing the tariffs to remain in place while the administration prepares an appeal to the Supreme Court.
President Trump quickly responded to the ruling via a post on Truth Social, asserting that the tariffs would continue and emphasizing their importance to American economic strength. His full statement reads:
“ALL TARIFFS ARE STILL IN EFFECT! Today a Highly Partisan Appeals Court incorrectly said that our Tariffs should be removed, but they know the United States of America will win in the end. If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the Country. It would make us financially weak, and we have to be strong. The U.S.A. will no longer tolerate enormous Trade Deficits and unfair Tariffs and Non Tariff Trade Barriers imposed by other Countries, friend or foe, that undermine our Manufacturers, Farmers, and everyone else. If allowed to stand, this Decision would literally destroy the United States of America. At the start of this Labor Day weekend, we should all remember that TARIFFS are the best tool to help our Workers, and support Companies that produce great MADE IN AMERICA products. For many years, Tariffs were allowed to be used against us by our uncaring and unwise Politicians. Now, with the help of the United States Supreme Court, we will use them to the benefit of our Nation, and Make America Rich, Strong, and Powerful Again! Thank you for your attention to this matter.”
Trump’s declaration aligns with his longstanding trade agenda, which began with an executive order in April 2025 declaring a national emergency over foreign trade practices and imposing a minimum 10 percent tariff on all U.S. imports, with higher rates on specific goods. This move aimed to address persistent trade deficits and protect domestic industries from what the administration views as unfair competition.
The president’s confidence in maintaining these tariffs stems from solid ground. The court’s stay ensures they remain enforced during the appeal process, preventing any immediate disruption to the economic protections they provide. Moreover, the administration’s path to the Supreme Court offers a strong opportunity for reversal, given recent precedents that have bolstered executive authority.
For instance, the Supreme Court’s 2024 ruling in Trump v. United States affirmed broad presidential immunity for official acts, which could influence interpretations of trade powers under statutes like the IEEPA. With a conservative majority on the bench, the Court may well side with the administration’s argument that such tariffs fall within the president’s discretion to safeguard national security and economic interests.