It’s not hyperbole to say that Tuesday night’s Pennsylvania Senate debate may have saved the state and the country from another two years of liberal wreckage. Voters finally learned what the Democratic Party, the liberal media, campaign officials, John Fetterman ’s doctor, and particularly his ambitious wife, Gisele, have been trying desperately to hide: Fetterman’s stroke earlier this year has rendered him unfit to perform the duties of a senator.
For months, this group worked together to conceal the truth from voters, and they were prepared to do whatever was necessary to carry him over the finish line. Unfortunately for them, from the moment Fetterman uttered his first words during the debate — “Hi. Good night, everybody” — the jig was up.
Knowing Fetterman was in no shape for a debate, his campaign tried desperately to avoid one. They saw nothing wrong with covering up a material fact about their candidate’s fitness for office. America already has a “Weekend at Bernie’s” president. Why not a senator as well?
Although the election of a cognitively challenged senator pales in comparison to the election of a cognitively challenged president, whoever wins the Pennsylvania Senate seat may very well determine party control of the Senate — and Democrats know it. Barring any October (or November) surprises, Republicans need to win three of the races currently ranked as toss-ups by RealClearPolitics : Arizona ( D +1.5 ), Georgia ( R +0.6 ), New Hampshire ( D +3.4 ), Nevada ( R +1.2 ), Pennsylvania ( D +0.3 ), and Wisconsin ( R +3.3 ).
Not to mention the great value Fetterman (Uncle Festerman) has rendered to the citizens of Pennsylvania since his stroke.
Confident he’s been cashing his Lt. Gov. checks while attending to none of his limited real duties.
He’s been a worthless lump before and after the medical misfortune.