Special Counsel John Durham may have lost this case, but he managed to shed plenty of light on the incestuous sleaze of the DC Swamp.
We figured it for a coin flip, and it came up tails. Yesterday, an appallingly pro-Hillary DC jury acquitted Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI, thus bringing to a bitter end a once-promising case and dashing the hopes of every idealistic American who (foolishly) believes Lady Justice is blind.
We can only imagine the disappointment of Special Counsel John Durham. But we wonder: Can he imagine ours? Durham certainly had enough evidence to bring an indictment on behalf of the government, but he ultimately had the fate of his case decided by — let’s call it what it was — a rigged jury.
Is “rigged” too strong a word? You tell us. The jury had “three Clinton donors, an AOC donor, and a woman whose daughter is on the same sports team with Sussmann’s daughter,” noted constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley. “With the exception of randomly selecting people out of the DNC headquarters, you could not come up with a worse jury.”
More succinctly, as Sean Connery’s Sam Malone character said of Chicago in “The Untouchables,” “This town stinks like a [brothel] at low tide.”
“I don’t think it should have been prosecuted,” said the jury forewoman of the case. “There are bigger things that affect the nation than a possible lie to the FBI.”
Silly us, thinking that lying to the FBI is a big deal — or even a minor crime.
Did we also mention that the ostensibly impartial judge in this case, Christopher Cooper, was an Obama appointee who once clerked for Abner Mikva, Bill Clinton’s White House counsel, and whose wife is also a lawyer and has Lisa Page as a client? (Page, you’ll recall, was the illicit love interest of FBI lead investigator Peter Strzok, the guy who Robert Mueller was forced to kick off the case because of his outrageous bias against Donald Trump and people who shop at Walmart.) None of these conflict-rich relationships were enough for Cooper to recuse himself, though. Nor were they enough to prevent him from limiting the scope of evidence Durham could produce that involved Clinton. And this, as Turley notes, “prevented prosecutors from showing more about the development of [that] false claim and the role of the campaign.” How sweet it must’ve been for Sussmann to have had the judge in his corner.
“Don’t tell me what the law is,” sniffed notorious DC lawyer Roy Cohn many years ago. “Tell me who the judge is.”
I can assure you John Durham knows exactly what he is doing. If you have lost hope oh well you just need to research something other than CNN. They can’t tell you the truth. But I will and here is a start for you.
Go to Telegram and search for Julian Assange the one with the 76.6 K subscribers go to June 2 and just have fun watching the videos, there is one there that you are absolutely going to love knowing about and if you think it is not real the actual Black and White one with the old Men in it is out there too and shows up from time to time.
I have got you started and you are on your own if you believe it fine if you don’t than oh well I guess you want to Own Nothing and Be Happy. The facts are out there to everything and it is up to each of us to discover the truth but at some point you are going to get hit with even more than this and a lot of it is going to be hard to handle and believe but unfortunately it is all true.
There is absolutely no doubt it was rigged.
Jury was filled with Hillary supporters. This should not have been allowed. Is there anyone or anything left in this country that is honest and can be believed? I don’t think so.