RINO Bush and Benedict Milley Have Chosen Obama’s False History of America

It has been the project of the political left for quite some time to convince Americans that there is nothing exceptional about their country.  To “fundamentally transform” a culture, you must first poison the roots of what has already been growing.  So for a century, Marxists have disparaged American history as steeped in genocide, imperialism, and avarice.

They have exploited the imagery of virtue and vice to convince moral people that their nation rose from immorality.  This has reached its logical apex with the historically illiterate 1619 Project, supported by elite news publications and academic institutions, reimagining America’s birth as bathed not in liberty, but rather enslavement.

Killing American history is not just a matter of destroying our collective identity as Americans, but also the vehicle for undermining notions of personal freedom.  Barack Obama famously revealed how little he understood about the United States when he mocked the idea of “exceptionalism” altogether: “I believe in American exceptionalism,” he said after becoming president, “just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism.”

After taking heat for so nonchalantly dismissing a point of American pride, Obama made sure to pay lip service to the idea of “American exceptionalism” for the remainder of his presidency.  When he did so, however, the “exceptionalism” of which he spoke was clothed in the trappings of postmodernism, personal identity, and power.  At various times, he pointed to America’s commitment to “international norms,” the ability of American NGOs to reshape societies abroad, government-funded science and health care, American economic dominance and military might, and even his own rise to power as proof of “American exceptionalism.”

More