Friday night, the Supreme Court rejected Texas’s case against the disputed states for “lack of standing.” There are a lot of theories for this decision, but Dick Morris said the unsayable: The Supreme Court was intimidated by the Democrats’ promised court-packing scheme.
The Texas lawsuit went directly to the Supreme Court because it is the only court that can litigate a dispute between two states, and therefore has original jurisdiction for such disputes. Texas’s claim was that the defendant states, by violating constitutional mandates for conducting their elections, injured Texas – which used legal means to vote for Trump – by fraudulently handing the election to Biden.
The Supreme Court, by a 7-2 margin, swiftly rejected the case:
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.
There is an undeniable truth about the courts. They demand evidence not rumor. And without evidence your complaint will be DENIED.
Worthless Biased courts Won’t Matter on Jan 06, 2021
when Congress has the SAY on who Won the Election 2020 !!!
3:52
The court didn’t look at ANY of the evidence you moron!
They said Texas lacked standing. Since the original court is a dispute between states is the supreme court, how does Texas lack standing?