sbynews

DelMarVa’s Premier Source for Conservative News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest

Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

EXCLUSIVE: Former CISA Chief Chris Krebs LIED Under Oath When He Said 2020 Was Most Secure Election Ever — Newly Recovered CISA Report Reveals Vulnerabilities in 76% of Election Infrastructure Entities

Recently, investigative journalist Yehuda Miller received several FOIA documents that completely redefine what we were told to believe about the 2020 US presidential election.

The election was billed by the Democrat Party, Joe Biden, the mainstream media, and former CISA Chief Chris Krebs as the most secure election in US history.

Chris Krebs, the former CISA Director fired by Donald Trump, testified before Congress on December 16, 2002, after he was fired. Krebs was called to testify before the US Senate Homeland Security Governmental Affairs Committee.

Krebs famously announced that day, “The 2020 election was the most secure in US history.”

But was 2020 really the most secure election in US history?

Yehuda Miller and The Gateway Pundit plan to release a series of FOIA documents in the coming days that prove Chris Krebs was not honest with the American public during his testimony and that he clearly knew his statements were inaccurate.

On Monday, we released information on a secret 2020 Election Day phone call organized by The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).

More

4 thoughts on “EXCLUSIVE: Former CISA Chief Chris Krebs LIED Under Oath When He Said 2020 Was Most Secure Election Ever — Newly Recovered CISA Report Reveals Vulnerabilities in 76% of Election Infrastructure Entities”

  1. They plan to release a series of documents that prove …. Sure. But why does nothing ever get proven in real life in court? Why do these alleged pieces of evidence never make it past the initial headlines proclaiming them? Why do they always just dissapear? Because they’re not real? Because they are just clickbait to attract website visits and clicks to earn advertising revenue? Or Putin propoganda? Or both?

    1. No 1:04, the evidence never makes the court rooms because the crooked ass democratic judges disallow it to be presented.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *