sbynews

DelMarVa’s Premier Source for Conservative News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest

Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent our advertisers

Oath Keepers Trial: Are Out-Of-Context Remarks, Vague Chat Threads, and Outright Lies Enough to Convince a DC Jury of Guilt? …YOU DECIDE

The Oath Keepers trial continues in far left Washington DC this week.  The DOJ prosecutors are working feverishly to manufacture a story that the patriotic group was planning to take over the US Capitol on January 6th despite leaving all of their weapons back in their hotel rooms.

This is the level of dishonesty and insanity that is running the seats of power in our society today.

looking over the battlefield, surveying and communicating while his troops stormed inside,” evidence revealed a different picture.

Was there a concrete, centralized plot to overthrow the government, or were the Oathkeepers decentralized and peaceful?

Is the government insinuating communication occurred when it didn’t?

In the trial of Stewart Rhodes, Kelly Meggs, Kenneth HarrelsonJessica Watkins, and Thomas Caldwell, the government alleges Rhodes circulated “leadership” threads on Signal. But there is no way to tell whether defendants saw chats or meeting invites due to the application’s encrypted technology.

More

1 thought on “Oath Keepers Trial: Are Out-Of-Context Remarks, Vague Chat Threads, and Outright Lies Enough to Convince a DC Jury of Guilt? …YOU DECIDE”

  1. A DC jury is going to be made up of mostly left wing Trump-haters…
    The actual chance of them getting a fair trial is non-existent!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *