The United Nations Commission on the Status of Women kicked off its 70th session on Monday in New York, drawing delegates from around the globe. This annual meeting aims to hammer out agreed conclusions — global policy recommendations — on this year’s priority of ensuring justice for women and girls. Yet controversy erupted right away. For the first time in decades, the document wasn’t adopted by consensus but passed by a rare recorded vote: 37 in favor, one against (the United States), and six abstentions.
What made the U.S. stand alone? Trump administration officials saw the document as anything but pro-woman, slamming it for pushing DEI frameworks, gender ideology that blurs biological sex, vague references to sexual and so-called “reproductive health,” and crucially, refusing to define “woman” or “gender.” This omission reflects the broader cultural battles raging over gender identity, where progressive ideologies have increasingly sought to blur the lines between biological sex and LGBT-related agendas.
In recent years, these debates have intensified, pitting biological views of binary sex against a radical push to redefine reality based on subjective feelings. Critics argue that this shift undermines women’s rights, safety, and achievements by allowing biological males to encroach on female-only spaces, from prisons and shelters to locker rooms and awards ceremonies.
According to Bethany Kozma, director of Global Affairs (OGA) at the Department of Health and Human Services, the U.N.’s document exemplifies this trend. She expressed disappointment in the document, saying how there was “no mention of motherhood or unique female experiences … and it failed to define what a woman is.” As she went on to state, “The UN Commission on Women is supposed to be for women, yet for years, it’s been co-opted to include men pretending to be women. Many countries claim to support and empower women, yet some of them cannot even answer the simple question: ‘What is a woman?’”
Yet rather than throwing in the towel, the U.S. opted to propose some amendments — the foremost being the suggestion that the document include a legitimate and clear definition of man and woman. Under the Trump administration, this move aligns with a broader effort to restore clarity on biological reality, reversing years of confusion sown by previous administrations. Kozma explained how the amendments “were just very common sense.” The Commission, however, appeared to see it differently. “Minutes before midnight on Sunday night,” The Daily Wire reported, “the council sent the final draft to the United States without acknowledging any of the American red lines that Kozma’s team had outlined.”