Our “disinformation experts” are at it again, this time churning out a whole passel of pseudoscience under the aegis of once-respected Nature magazine to prove that icky, stupid right-wingers are dumb dumb dummies and that they deserve to be banned from X!
Not like the supergeniuses of the modern left, who always get everything right and never tell lies.
A new study — presumably peer reviewed — purports to show that Trump supporters and conservatives shared “low quality” news more often than their more enlightened counterparts and thus deserved the “politically asymmetric” sanctions.
All five of the authors list themselves as “Google Scholars,” by the way: In other words, they have the seal of approval from the Big Tech outfit whose AI turned out to generate images of black Nazis and female Asian Vikings to serve the cause of “equity” at the expense of the truth.
And this study is another case of “garbage in, garbage out”: A huge part of its definition of “low quality” seems to mean sources that don’t rely on “fact checking” — which as the past eight years have shown has become a spurious and utterly partisan endeavor.