Whenever a sexually-explicit book is introduced or a school policy on material selection is challenged, the sexual predators come out of their dark caves as their agenda to sexually groom children becomes threatened. Of the random people we’ve interviewed, nobody is after banning or censoring books. The real concern is the agenda to sexualize children through the use of obscene content in schools. However, politically-compromised outside organizations like the American Library Association (ALA), American Association of School Librarians (AASL), Maryland Library Association (MLA), and the Maryland Association of School Librarians (MASL) lay the foundation of grooming under the guise of reading.
These organizations all parrot each other’s selection standards. They all have their own bill of rights, which the school systems adopts. Interesting how outside agencies and activist organizations all have direct influence of what goes into our school media centers, but tax-paying citizens do not. Below is a list of the top 14 false narratives and baseless arguments regurgitated by groomers who follow the script of these outside organizations.
1. Parents are out to ban books like Dr. Seuss, Harry Potter, and The Giving Tree.
Innocent books are selected to create a false narrative that parents are out to destroy all children’s books. Campaigns like this are propagated by school media specialist with books like “Ban This Book” to indoctrinate kids of this false narrative, which calls the children to activism and to defiantly lie to their parents, defy authority, deceive, cheat, and steal.
2. Book burners are after your freedom to read, as were the Nazis.
The Nazi card is pulled out quite a bit. Parents who object to obscenity in the schools must be Nazis out to suppress all knowledge and virtue by a good, old-fashioned book burning in the town square. Parents are also made out to be oppressors of the freedom to read.
3. Parents want to ban books written by authors of color.
Since everything must be racist, they want to ignore the content of the book’s character and focus on the color of the author. Color must always be relevant and used as a diversion. Anyone who challenges content written by a black author must be a racist white supremacist.
4. Parents wanting to ban books are specifically targeting LGBTQ books.
This is all well and good- but how many of the same parents who are concerned about library materials allow their sons or daughter to have cell phones, or unsupervised access to computers? How many parents are worried about the “bad books”, but aren’t giving thier own children a love of reading good books? How many of us sit and stare at our cells phones in front of our children, or watch television for hour after hour , instead of modeling quiet reading time at home?
Don’t misunderstand. These books have no place in polite society. But if you are not doing everything you can to rear children who have good morals and would not be interested or tempted to read them, you are going to lose. You cannot block out every bad website, or every bad thought from their minds. The world cannot be bubble-wrapped. You need to create good solid thinkers who know right from wrong and who can deal with temptation. If you cant be bothered to turn off the Real Housewive of Hackensack or stop looking at facebook for ten minutes- you have no legs to stand on. Stop filling your mind and your kids mind with trash.
Instead or worrying so much others, how about we worry about our own children? Let them have their books. Let our children read Tolkein or Narnia, or Pride and Pedjudice (or whatever good books are age appropriate) and not be interested at all in thier garbage. The solution is not to ban, but to make the Maoist gender-queer folks irrelevant.