HUGE ELECTION UPDATE: Data Supporting the Reported Results of the 2020 Election Does NOT Reconcile with Data in Voting Machine Files – Something Is Very Wrong

After the 2020 Election steal, we knew things were very wrong.  Now as experts dig into the 2020 Election results, the final results don’t seem to reconcile with anything. 

We learned in 2020 that American elections are a mess.  Now here we are a year and a half later and we are uncovering more evidence that the final results in 2020 never should have been certified.

We reported within days of the election and since then that the final numbers made no sense.  This was highlighted in our work surrounding the Drop and Roll.

The Edison data used in the above video has since been dug into much deeper.  Draza Smith and Jeff O’Donnell are two data experts who began looking at this data.  They made numerous observations after doing so as noted in the article below.  Some key points are:

• Edison data with state totals are provided to mainstream media outlets like the New York Times showing reportedly up-to-date results of the election for each state
• There is a separate stream of election data based on county reporting that goes to the state
• The Edison state data supplied to the media and the county data supplied to the state don’t mirror each other and don’t agree until very late in the process – these results should mirror each other at all times accounting for timing issues
• During the 2020 Election, all Edison data results for all states went to zero, and then when the numbers were reported again the Edison state data showed that President Trump had lost votes in many states.  It appears that this ‘Edison zero’ event was done to make it look like President Trump was doing worse in several states
• The Edison state data and county data cannot be reconciled
• Edison state data was always less than the county data (except with DC)
• Ultimately both the Edison state data and the county data come to an agreement at the end of the election
• The Edison state data appears almost completely fictional to paint a story to the public
• The county data may be fictional as well to some extent but not as off as Edison state data.
• Edison data reporting is most likely related to an algorithm or pre-determined value
• Battleground states actually had more refined reporting down to the precinct level rather than county level as in other states
• The ratio of Trump to Biden votes in the Edison data appears preset for each state before the election
• But when Texas and then Florida went to Trump voting had to stop while they rearranged the remainder of the swing state votes
• The Edison zero moment occurred after Florida was called for Trump
• All states show this pattern
• There may be some type of controller that manages the votes – a device similar to ones used in multiple industries
• Jeff O’Donnell “I have probably done a fairly deep dive on 12 different states and I have found unacceptable, unacceptable things in all 12.  Even in my worst nightmares previous to this election, I never dreamed that anything like this on such a massive scale could happen.  We need answers to so many questions.”
• Draza Smith shared: “Everything we’ve put together with the idea of how things happened here, played out exactly the same way in the California recall election.  Why did all those people…go in and vote and be told, oh you can’t vote, you’ve already cast a vote…So the things that we’re seeing happening are falling into line that it’s the same, it’s the same, it’s the same.  We need to start demanding the answers as to why the same, the same, the same.”
• We need an audit of our time stamps.  We need to get a better idea of how a ballot goes from the voter, to the tabulator, to the state and Edison and eventually to the New York Times.

More